Pediatric emergencies remain among the most challenging and anxiety-provoking calls in EMS. While providers often focus on assessment findings, vital signs, and treatment algorithms, another critical factor influences patient outcomes: how we think. Children frequently compensate for serious illness and injury until they suddenly decompensate. Their ability to appear well despite significant physiologic compromise can create a false sense of reassurance, delaying recognition and intervention. Compounding this challenge are common cognitive biases, including anchoring, confirmation bias, premature closure, and normalization of abnormal findings, that can unintentionally influence clinical judgment during pediatric encounters. Through emotionally impactful case reviews, audience interaction, and evidence-based discussion, this session examines both the clinical and cognitive factors that contribute to missed pediatric deterioration. Participants will learn to identify subtle indicators of respiratory failure, shock, sepsis, and critical illness, and develop strategies to recognize and overcome common decision-making traps. Attendees will leave with practical tools that improve pediatric assessment, strengthen clinical reasoning, and increase confidence in identifying the child who appears stable but is quietly moving toward crisis. More importantly, they will gain a deeper understanding of how human factors influence patient care and how awareness of those factors can prevent the next near miss. This presentation is designed for EMTs, AEMTs, paramedics, nurses, educators, and EMS leaders seeking to improve pediatric readiness, patient safety, and clinical decision-making in the prehospital environment.
840 Armed Forces Dr
Ashwaubenon, WI 54304
United States
1. Identify subtle signs and symptoms associated with impending pediatric respiratory failure, shock, sepsis, and clinical deterioration.
2. Describe common cognitive biases that contribute to delayed recognition of serious pediatric illness and injury.
3. Apply structured assessment techniques to improve recognition of high-risk pediatric patients who initially appear stable.
4. Utilize strategies to reduce diagnostic error and improve clinical decision-making during pediatric emergencies.
5. Integrate human factors awareness into pediatric patient assessment to improve patient safety and outcomes.